Luciana F. Schroeder, Ana L. C. Bazzan, João Valiati, Paulo M. Engel, Sérgio Ceroni.
The aim of this work is to carry out a comparison between symbolic and nonÂsymbolic approaches regarding the task of automated annotation of the field called Keywords in SWISSÂPROT. The nonÂsymbolic technique employed was a feedforward artificial neural network (ANN), while the symbolic ones was CN2. Using an ANN trained with the wellÂknown Backpropagation algorithm over previously annotated data from public databases like SWISSÂPROT, a classifier was built up that maps attributes of a specific protein to keywords encountered in SWISSÂPROT and TrEMBL databases. The symbolic counterpart, CN2, builds a specific classifier for each keyword. Regarding the nonÂsymbolic approach, the resulted classifier is much more compact than the symbolic counterpart. However, the symbolic one had a slightly better performance and is also more "readable" to the end user. The performance of the obtained classifier was evaluated using data taken out SWISSÂPROT (for training) and TrEMBL for validation.
http://www.lbd.dcc.ufmg.br:8080/colecoes/wob/2002/011.pdf
Caso o link acima esteja inválido, faça uma busca pelo texto completo na Web: Buscar na Web